This is the second in a series of blogs on the new final ADA and GINA rules for wellness programs.ย In our first blog, we noted that certain wellness programs are permitted by the ADA if they are voluntary.ย We begin this blog with a discussion of what it means for a wellness program to be voluntary.
For a wellness program to be considered voluntary under the ADA, the employer:
Originally (i.e., prior to the publication of the proposed rule), the EEOC took the view that any financial penalty for non-participation or failure to meet a goal would render the program involuntary.ย ย In the proposed and final rule the EEOC has rethought its position and concluded that an employer may offer incentives up to a maximum of 30 percent of the total cost of self-only coverage (including both the employeeโs and employerโs contribution) without causing a wellness program to be classified as involuntary.
For purposes of this limitation, the term โincentivesโ should be understood to include both rewards and penalties and rewards that are in-kind as well as financial.ย Employers may use any reasonable method of valuing its in-kind incentives.ย However, even โde minimisโ incentives must be counted toward the 30% maximum.
This leaves the question of which plan an employer should use to calculate the 30% limit.ย The rule details the choice of plan as follows:
The reader will have noticed that we have said nothing about incentives related to participation by an employeeโs spouse or dependents.ย This is because the ADA does not govern this aspect of wellness programs.ย However, GINA โ also regulated by the EEOC – does reach it and the reader (spoiler alert) should not be surprised to find that final wellness rules under GINA incorporate incentive limits that look very much like those that apply under the ADA.
As part of its discussions on incentive limitations, the EEOC reminds employers that the reasonable accommodation rules apply, regardless of whether a wellness program is otherwise subject to the final rule.ย Interpretive guidance to the final rule offers the following illustrations:
An employer may obtain information collected as part of an employee health program in aggregate form that does not disclose, and is not reasonably likely to disclose, the identity of specific individuals as is necessary to administer the plan.ย While the ADA provides that information gathered in the course of providing employees with voluntary health services may be disclosed to managers and supervisors in connection with necessary work restrictions or accommodations, the EEOC makes the point that โsuch an exception would rarely, if ever, apply to medical information collected as part of a wellness program.โย It also notes that wellness programs that are considered health plans under HIPAA would also be subject to the latterโs rules on privacy and security.ย It allows that a program that meets HIPAAโs requirements would likely pass muster under the ADA.
Finally, an employer may not require an employee to agree to the sale, exchange, sharing, transfer, or other disclosure of medical information (except to the extent as necessary to carry out specific activities related to the wellness program), or waive confidentiality protections available under the ADA as a condition for participating in a wellness program or receiving a wellness program incentive.